LA Weekly recommends The Mysteries

Adam S. May 25

In the May 26th issue of LA Weekly, The Mysteries is Recommended. Here's the review:

Neal Weaver

[link to review at LA Weekly (reg. req)]

The Creation In Edward Kemp’s selection and adaptation of the English Medieval Mystery plays, ambitiously performed on two separate bills respectively subtitled The Creation and The Passion (see review below), The Creation impressionistically spans the Old Testament, from the creation of the world to the birth of Jesus. It’s rich and sometimes funny material in which an old and impotent Joseph (Anthony Brocatto Powell) is infuriated to discover his virgin wife, Mary (Sharyn-genel Gabriel), is pregnant, and aggravated by how the Shepherds relate intimately to the newborn Jesus. He’s the messiah, but he’s also a baby, whom they address as "Hail, darling dear!" and "Hail, little milksop!" Unlike the Magi, the shepherds bring homely gifts: a wooden box, a bird and a tennis ball.

Read the rest of the review after the jump.

Through the seven centuries (950 to 1570 A.D.) when the Mystery Plays flourished, all initiatives were faith-based, whether they emanated from church or state. In a rigidly unified and stratified society, most Europeans believed Christian dogma, and heaven and hell were powerful realities. The first plays were created and acted by the clergy, based on biblical narratives, to edify largely illiterate congregations, but when their production was taken over by the trade guilds, secular values crept in, including lavish spectacle, comic horseplay, satire and parody. Nevertheless, the plays seem to belong to a world radically different from our own, as surprising in their sophistication as in their naiveté. Kemp’s adaptation hews to the original material wherever possible, with the Middle English occasionally translated for clarity. Director Michael Nehring steers a tricky course among the varied materials, and he’s well-served by a passionately dedicated cast of 12. Paul R. DeDoes’ set is a sort of jungle-gym for actors, making for an athletic performance, but providing poor sightlines.

Comments

While I am happy to receive a Recommended from the LA Weekly I am dissappointed in the actual criticism or lack of criticism in this poorly written "review." It is more of a synopsis of the play and historical contextualization of mystery cycle plays in general. Actual critical in depth commentary about the play is lacking. Isn't there a Symposium of Theatre Critics going on in L.A. currently or soon? Hmmmm...

Edgar Landa | May 26

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)